I’m A Grown A** Woman (I think)
September 23, 2008
I became a grown up at the age of 23. I grew up as an only child with a single mother who was/is the perfect mix of positive enabler and disciplinarian. I had regular chores, numerous creature comforts, freedom, and (in my teen years) the respect for a parent that forms after skipping curfew one too many times. I was very comfortable. So comfortable, in fact, that when college came and my friends hurried to move away from home, I opted to keep residence where I had been all of my life- my mother’s house.
Graduation commenced, and I still stayed. Why leave when things were perfectly fine the way they were? I had a job, a healthy personal life, privacy, and no bills. This was THE LIFE! My mom wasn’t complaining and neither was I. Then, strangely, something changed. I started to FEEL like a kid again, and I didn’t like it. Here I was, 23 years old, technically an adult, yet not GROWN. I was carrying on a grown-up relationship, working at a grown-up job, yet still relying on my mother to take care of her grown-up daughter. It wasn’t right, and I could feel it. So, to accept and somewhat prove (to myself) my adulthood and maturity, I saved and got my very first apartment.
At last! I lived on my own- no mom, no roommate, no dependency on anyone other than myself. It was exhilarating and terrifying, but I’d deemed it necessary. Finally, I felt like a true adult. I was grown and you couldn’t tell me nothin’! However, like it often does, the fantasy quickly died, the bills started coming, and *gasp*, was that a roach???
The responsibilities of adulthood began consuming my life and at times I longed for my old, comfortable, free, roach-less, quiet bedroom in my mother’s house. But I’d made this choice and I was sticking to it. I was grown, and that’s what grown-ups did!
Still, despite the pitfalls that came with my transition into adulthood, I appreciated my independence. I’ve learned how to survive on my own and how to take care of myself. I have been on my own for almost 3 years now and have grown in the way that only living on your own can facilitate. I still miss living with my mom, especially when I visit and she’s made one of her signature meals (thanks for dinner, by the way!). I go by her fly-diva bachelorette pad often and smile as I see manifestations of her personality paired with pictures of me loving placed about. And after I visit, I go home, to MY house, to resume MY grown-up life. It’s not exactly what I’d envisioned three years ago, but it’s done for me what I wanted- grow me up. And I’m proud of myself for taking that step- roaches, nosy neighbors, bills and all- because it’s what I needed for ME. Oh, and I learned how to cook….kind’ve. Stop laughing.
My experience with moving out and on my own signified the time in my life when I tasted the sweet and sometimes bitter taste of grown-up life for the first time. So as I reflect on my first time, I ask you lovely
readers- when was the 1st time you really felt like a grown-up?
Hugs and Kisses,
T. Hobbs
No Money, No Money, No Money
September 8, 2008
Sorry for the unexpected delay. Life got in the way and I had to take care of some things. And I think that the following will make up for my absence. So, here we go!
Nearly one month ago I was asked to become a contributor for TheConcreteJournal.Com. At the time, my 1st article, “Can A Sista Get A Check Around Here”, reflected a socio-economically craptastic situation that I was facing with trying to secure unemployment this summer. I invited you lovely readers into my world as I attempted to solicite financial assistance due to my usually full-time position being reduced to less than part-time during August. I admitted that I was aware of the pit-falls of my job as a behavior therapist for special needs kids, and that being off during the summer was one such aspect. Still, my previous summers with the company weren’t nearly as disasterous as this one turned out to be. So I, like MILLIONS of other Californians went to our government to claim the aid that we were always told we were certain to receive in times of need.
What a *bleeping* LIE.
I applied for partial and then full unemployment almost two-TWO- months ago, and guess what- NOTHING. Well, actually I received one letter telling me I didn’t qualify, which I appealed probably in record time for their offices. And, then a phone call telling me that my appeal was received and that ANOTHER call would be placed to let me know if and when my case would be recognized. Another waiting game was in effect.
From mid-July through September 2nd, I worked a TOTAL of 68 hours.
That’s very different from the nearly 40 hours per week I’m accustomed to working. Clearly, I had more idle time than I knew what to do with, but nothing to do about it. During those two months, I called the unemployment offices repeatedly, but to no avail. During those two months our California legislature was unable to create and balance a budget, resulting in more horrific budget cuts and lay-offs. During those two months, I lived on 1/4th of what I usually make. During those two months my bills didn’t stop coming- go figure. During those two months my relationship(s) suffered. During those two months, I was a prisoner in my own house. Gas was too high, so my just-for-fun driving was cut out. Eating out was drastically scaled back, but I did lose 2 pounds, so I guess there were some advantages. During those two months I randomly researched and subsequently found out that many impoverished tribes in the most destitute areas of Africa survive on less than 500 calories per day, compared to the nearly 3,000 that Americans consume daily. And during those two months, I was a captive audience for the endless streams of political speeches, debates, commercials, and cable news commentary shows. During those two months I learned some things about how concerned we can be about other people’s money, and how money has come to dictate contentment in our own lives. And not receiving the unemployment benefits that I so desperately needed was merely a reminder of this.
While it’s no secret that I am in complete support of Barack Obama (see “Barack Is Still Black”) I am not so ignorant as to ignore what he plans to do if elected. I recognize that there will be some areas of his hypothetical presidency that I won’t agree with, and others that I will.
So, I listen closely to what he and John McCain say to expand my understanding of their plans to move our country into the next four years if victorious in the election. Still, what I am sick with concern about are how the greatest problems in our country will be dealt with, and how impoverished many of us are in this country is close to the top of that list.
During those two months, I watched as the California legislature took a lot of heat for irresponsible spending habits of political and public officials. Hundreds of thousands of dollars were found to have been spent on lavish dinners, chartered jets, and vacations, yet I couldn’t fill up my gas tank without a prayer. More time was spent giving press to individuals who were eating and spending on the public’s dime than to resolving the issues that have plagued many, including myself. Media outlets scrutinized over details about both presidential candidate’s finances and ideas, thoughts, and values about money in their personal and private lives. Two such instances stood out more prominantly amongst the many attacks and questions about both candidates and their families.
First, the dress that Michelle Obama wore on her appearance on “The View” was discussed amongst the ladies, and all delighted in the fact that it cost less than $180 and was bought at a very popular retail chain store. Then, John McCain infamously was unable to recall HOW MANY homes he and his wife own (7) when asked by a political news outlet.
More recently, documents were discussed about Senator Obama’s earnings last year (approx. 4 million dollars), and John McCain made and quickly retracted a statement suggesting that a person is not rich until he EXCEEDS earning 5 million dollars. Both parties dissected and challenged the other’s claim as to who would be more in touch with the people of this country, and I watched and listened intently, wondering who would be better able to pull us out of this impending recession.
I later shared with a friend of mind something I’d read about what Sen.
John McCain’s wife, Cindy, wore to the Republican National Convention the night that McCain accepted his party’s nomination. A political blog brought in an “expert” who speculated that the cost of Cindy McCain’s clothes, jewelry and styling exceeded $300,000.00. One friggin aesthetic representation that cost the price of a below-average home in Los Angeles county, or could help still-struggling New Orleans citizens get back on their feet. It’s so frustrating.
I brought these comparisons to your attention to inform you and to introduce you to the hypocrisy of the fact that we’re the richest country in the world, but with a growing rate of poverty and unemployment that could rival any third-world country. I’m around people daily who are struggling just to stay above water. They’re not spending frivously or being irresponsible. They’re just trying to live. They shouldn’t have to decide between putting gas in their car to make it to work, or to buy dinner for their family. And there’s a reason that money issues are among the leading causes of divorces and separations.
Not to sound elitist, but I am a very proud graduate of the University of Southern California. I went to my institution expecting to graduate and have a six-figure job practically handed to me. That didn’t happen, so I worked my way through a diverse array of jobs to figure out what I wanted to be when I grew up. And today, September 7, 2008, my full-time schedule has resumed, and I am wondering how I’m going to pay my rent. I find it absolutely disgusting that the unemployment offices have still not called me back to this day, and yet I’m still not one of those who are more negatively affected. I have a mother who helps me when she can and a boyfriend who I live with, yet I still can’t comfortably pay my monthly bills without hyperventilating. My $160,000 USC education didn’t prepare me for this, nor was it an environment I was raised in, so it’s a bit foreign to me. I miss being able to shop often, eat out, vacation, and be more carefree, but I love my job, and it’s a fulfilling and fun one at that, and I thought that was what I was supposed to strive for in a career. More lies. It’s not my fault that the government who funds my line of work doesn’t consider it significant enough to improve our financial compensation. But lest we forget, John McCain and Sarah Palin want us to believe that they’ll be advocates for the special needs community, all because she has an infant with Down’s Syndrome who was passed around their convention for convenient photo ops. Please.
Companies like the one I work for who have made it their missions to help special needs children and adults are being closed everyday due to lack of funding. But I have a job, and for that I’m greatful, yet saddended that I’ll have to seek another career sooner than later to help support myself and live a life that affords me some normal “luxuries” that I should have. It scares me to think about those who have children, unforseen illnesses, are losing their homes, or are located where there are simply no jobs. What are they supposed to do?
According to the government- your loyal and loving government- just wait.
Hugs and Kisses,
T. Hobbs
The Other Woman
August 28, 2008
*This is Part 2 to “All Men Cheat, Or At Least That’s What We’re
Told…”*
“Tiffany, you just hate women”, he said to me after I’d accused the chick of flirting with him. Well, damn. I wouldn’t say I “hate” all women. That’s a bit harsh. I just don’t like the majority of the women I come into contact with. Furthermore, I have a problem with a CERTAIN type of woman and I don’t know if that woman over there is going to fall into that category.
It hasn’t always been this way. I used to have no problems with women.
But experiences change things, and now, I don’t trust women for what many have become, which is a threat to my relationship.There are increased numbers of women who have anxiously settled into the position of being the “other woman”, and it makes it difficult for us self-respecting ladies to co-exist with them on a daily basis. When did the prospect of being the “other woman” become more important than striving to have healthy relationships of their own? How can women be so destructive but unapolegetic about the damage they are causing to the sanctity of relationships?
Before you may label me, I’m not a “hater”. I despise the word as I feel that it’s used in a very immature and juvenile context, which is not how I want you, my readers, to consider me. Instead, I have come to the realization that the “other woman” has become a glamorized depiction of betrayal and conquest (Angelina ring a bell?). Yes, it has a lot to do with the movies, magazines, videos, blah blah blah. We know that already. We all see mistresses becoming famous, writing tell-all books, and being given air-time to seemingly brag about what they’ve done to another person’s life. It’s not a secret. My issue is with those women who don’t have the wherewithall to differentiate between fantasy and the cold, hard truth. The women other women are around at work and in their daily activities. The women who want YOUR man.
Through wanting to please men and beat the competition, women have become each other’s own worst enemy as they strive to get a man, even YOUR man, by any means possible.
I see young women, older women, walking down streets, shopping in grocery stores, hanging out in groups, at my bowling night, after school picking up their children- all semi-clothed in outfits that barely cover their butts, boobs, and booming desperation. They’re covered by a fabric of self-pity that does nothing to mask their desire for attention and validation. And they’d just as soon smile in your face yet flirt with your man as soon as you turn your back. And the girlfriends and wives never know, which only adds fuel to that fire.
I see women who have male friends or co-workers and unabashedly put down the mens’ girlfriends or wives to make themselves look like the better
woman- “your girl doesn’t like to (feel in the blank)? What is she thinking? She must not know what she’s got….”. If you haven’t been the perpetrator, you’ve definitely been the victim.
I see women, so starved for male admiration, that they’ll do just about anything to get it. They’ll come around men who are “taken” and act inappropriately in hopes that maybe, just maybe, one of those men will turn their glance her way and she will have taken someone’s man and increased her struggling self-confidence. Trust me, it happens often.
Again, if you haven’t been the perpetrator, please believe you’ve been the victim.
And I see women who are very comfortable being the “h_e”, and will do anything and everything to let it be known to the men nearby, regardless of those mens’ relationship status. Groupies, anyone?
Many women are so focused on getting a man or his attention that they’ll backstab other women just to meet their goals, affecting relationships in the process. Due to this desperation, women don’t want to, and can not, comfortably relax with their men when they’re around other women.
Still, because we’re not psychic, women can’t often accurately differentiate between a woman with ill-intentions and a woman who respects herself enough not to compromise her integrity. So, to prevent any accidents from happening, we guard ourselves and closely monitor women to make sure they don’t prove our suspicions right. That paranoia is causing many women, including myself, to feel uncomfortable in the presence of women when I’m with my man. Maybe he’s too handsome. Or maybe he’s just a man with a pulse and that makes him fair game. I don’t know. But I do know that women never know when a woman who would be happy to be the “other woman” is lurking in the shadows. The allure of being the ”other woman” has the power to blind those women to how pathetic they are, and we realize that and often point it out to our men, who become annoyed, and with reason. What our men don’t understand is how hard we hope, wish and pray that they are strong enough to combat such a frivolous proposition if offered.
It’s not always due to a woman’s insecurity. No matter how secure a woman may be in herself or her relationship, she never fully knows if her man will be able to withstand the power of a woman who wants to be the chick-on-the-side. And with these types of women increasing in quantity everyday, respectable women are being outnumbered, and some men fall victim to their no-strings-attached idealogies. As a result, once normal, trusting women have become distrustful and cautious, which often comes off as bitchy and insecure. Thus, a cycle is created.
It shouldn’t be like this.
A woman should not be concerned with questioning if another woman is attempting to steal her man. We should be able to go out with our dates, boyfriends or husbands without feeling like we’ve entered a competiton to secure an endangered species. Until women stop lusting after taken men and subjecting themselves to the demeaning “other woman” status, relationships will continue to be threatened, and women will be pitted against each other. And I will always give a mean side-eye to the chick across the way who’s staring a bit too hard in my man’s
direction. She better recognize.
Hugs and Kisses,
T. Hobbs
Barack Is Still Black
August 22, 2008
On a recent episode of “The View”, co-host Whoopi Goldberg and special
guest, Michelle Obama, had an exchange that thrust stereotypes about the
black female into the forefront of the discussion. Whoopi said that more
often than not, black women were portrayed in the national media as
being “toothless, with gold all around them, and (are unable) to put a
sentence together”. Whoopi’s comment was made to highlight and applaud
how Michelle Obama’s image has hopefully encouraged a more positive
representation of the black woman and her family.
Whoopi wasn’t pushing her political agenda or idealogies. Instead she
was suggesting how influential images and what those inages represent,
have become in shaping the minds of those who see them. Michelle Obama’s
appearance of “The View” was as attempt in the company of many others at
trying to dissuade potential voters from seeing Barack Obama’s race as
being a hinderance, while combating the negative and very unflattering
imagery that represents black culture. Sadly, Mrs. Obama’s appearance
was largely in vain. She is battling an idea manipulated by the media
which could very well cause Mr. Obama the presidential race.
Barack Obama is losing.
It’s been written that, in November, the majority of registered black
voters will vote for Barack Obama. Still, according to sources, most
white people have shown discomfort with having a black
Commander-In-Chief
(http://heraldnet.com/article/20080813/NEWS02/354994240/1089/NEWS07).
Data collectors and analysts have found that while white and other
non-black people were likey to TELL pollsters that they’d vote for
Obama, they were less likely to actually do so in November because of a
multitude of hesitations, many which were linked directly to Obama being
black.
The reason Barack Obama may not win the election is not because of his
“lack of experience”- it’s because he’s black, and some people,
non-black and black alike, are uncomfortable with what his “blackness”
represents.
Today, television, cinema, print, and radio do more to harm the image of
the black person than they do to squash misconceptions. We have a whole
network dedicated to celebrating modern day shucking and jiving that
gives people a glimpse into what could be considered as the priorities
of black people. If people rely on what they see or hear to determine
how to view blacks, then we as those black people are doomed to be
misunderstood and miscategorized, while others continue to be misled.
A very current, legitimate example of how representation can form the
ideas of millions can be observed through watching BET’s hit series,
“Baldwin Hills”. The answer to MTV’s “Laguna Beach” and “The Hills”,
“Baldwin Hills” is one a representation of black culture that is
particularl hard for me to watch. While ”Laguna Beach” portrayed it’s
”characters” as being academically driven yet care-free, glamorous, and
from solid families, “Baldwin Hills” portrays itself as being the gritty
counterpart, yet it caters to the same audience as MTV. “Baldwin Hills”
has introduced it’s viewers to teenage characters who deal with
illigitimate children, absentee fathers, relatives who are drug abusers,
pregnancy, and gang violence. I applaud the show’s quest to be more than
just a show about well-to-do teens in the suburbs, but I don’t agree
with perpetuating stereotypes that we often see on the news, just to
drum up ratings. Still, this show is seen by millions of people, is in
syndication and on dvd, and is helping to shape how black people are
seen.
Why does the show that represents black people have to include the very
things that inject fear into those who don’t know us?
Fear can be contagious and has the power to influence those it takes
hold of. Fear might also be the driving force behind Barack Obama
losing the election in November. Not solely because of “Baldwin Hills”,
but because of what his race- the black race- has come to represent. And
many whites cannot see a representative of such volatile imagery as
being the leader of their red, white, and blue country.
Barack Obama cannot escape his association to a race plagued by the
curse of inadequacy. Nor should Mr. Obama consider his race a
hinderance, and he clearly doesn’t, as he gives praise to his culture
and to his wife’s heritage in interview after interview. But,
truthfully, being black is hurting his chances to win.
Barack cannot single-handedly improve upon an un-improvable situation
that is rooted deeply and painfully in a history that has beat the black
person down. He can not politely ask the woman at the supermarket to not
physically discipline her children in public because many white people
do not agree with physical punishment. He cannot insist that the young
brother walking down the street pull up his pants and turn his hat
forward to not give off the appearance of a gangbanger. He cannot sit
next to the young sister as she is preparing to engage in a sexual act
that will impregnate her and cause her to be a statistic. And he cannot
ask that man to acknowledge that young sister’s baby to dispel the myth
that black men are dead-beat dads. As much power and charisma as Barack
and Michelle Obama have to display a more positive image, the power of
fear of what the Obamas represent, and to those who are not of the black
race, is that much stronger. Thankfully, Whoopi publicized what many
black people were and still are thinking. Not every black person is how
the media paints them as being, and there’s no need to fear us. Still,
it’s going to take a lot more challenging of what the media wants others
to think of the black man and woman before that fear loses it’s power.
Good luck, Barack. I hope you win.
Hugs and Kisses,
T. Hobbs
P.S. VOTE! VOTE! VOTE!
All Men Cheat… Or At Least That’s What We’re Told
August 18, 2008
All Men Cheat, Or At Least That’s What We’re Told
I’ve been cheated on 3 times that I know of. The “cheaters” were immature at the time, and later admitted their transgressions out of guilt and regret. Still, it’s a terrible feeling of helplessness and hopelessness that someone who’s been cheated on is left with.
As I write this, I’m reflecting over watching the sequel, “Three Can Play That Game” on BET. Don’t laugh. It’s actually not as bad as you might think. It follows the same premise as its predecessor, “Two Can Play That Game”, and, has been keeping my attention for the last hour, which has to be a record for me and my tolerance of BET. But that’s another story for another day.
Anyway, in this storyline, the beautiful and intelligent main character, “Tiffany”, catches her very handsome, very successful boyfriend in the act of kissing a female colleague. Tiffany’s best friend comes to her aid, and in her attempt to help her cope, tells her that “all men (are) dogs. You just have to find a loyal one”. In retrospect, I believe that Tiffany’s best friend used that sentence to depersonalize what Tiffany had just experienced. She wanted Tiffany to understand and accept that all men cheat, so it’s not YOU, it’s THEM. And there’s nothing you can do about it, no matter how good of a woman you are. It is in this way that all men get painted with the same brush, regardless of their fidelity track record.
The idea that men can’t be faithful in a relationship is far from a recent discovery. Still, women find the need to obtain other viewpoints about the illusive male monogamy gene. It’s through validation of this idea that women experience the double edged sword of the truth that is convenient for them.
If a woman subscribes to the idea that ALL men cheat, then it is easier for her to have low expectations of her man, because he is SUPPOSED to misbehave. It’s in “his nature”, and no amount of nurturing will change that. So she leaves. But if she stays, and if/when that man proves his woman’s assumptions right, then she has to reconcile the fact that she’s in a relationship with someone who is largely considered to be genetically predisposed to infidelity. So, still, it’s nothing that she can control. I, like many women, have embraced these ideas as a way to guard myself from the heartache associated with infidelity. This way, a woman can escape any (even obvious) blame, depersonalizes what has happened, and instead places that blame on the cheating man. Now, that scorned woman can tell other women that her man cheated, therefore all men cheat, because it happened to her. I wonder if Halle, Lisa Raye, and the many other women who have been cheated on have had those same conversations such as the ones above.
It can be a vicious cycle: Woman thinks man will cheat. Man stays faithful. Woman still accuses him. Man gets fed up and cheats. Woman’s presumptions are validated. The “All Men Cheat” idea becomes true.
Furthermore, this can lead to usually faithful men considering stepping out on their women, due to the fact that they’re expected to do so anyway. Then, the stereotype is fulfilled- women develop trust issues because of bad experiences, and men feel unfairly vilified.
Happy responding!
Hugs and Kisses,
T. Hobbs
Recent Comments